Cover layers to prevent weed growth

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to a soil cover, a method for preventing weed growth by using a soil cover, the use of potato steam peels and the use of a cork fraction of potato steam peels for preventing weed growth. A soil cover according to the invention comprises potato steam peels or a part, derivative or analogue thereof. In a different embodiment, a soil cover according to the invention comprises a cork fraction of potato steam peels or a part, derivative or analogue thereof.

The invention relates to a soil cover, a method for preventing weed growth by using a soil cover, the use of potato steam peels for preventing weed growth and the use of a cork fraction of potato steam peels for preventing weed growth.

The potato steam peel is a residual product of the potato processing industry and chiefly consists of carbohydrates (starch, cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin), protein and a cork fraction. The cork fraction is present in the skin of the potato. From a chemical point of view, cork consists inter alia of a number of layers of wax, cutin and suberin. These are, substantially, saturated and unsaturated fatty acids. The composition of the cork fraction is codependent on the origin of the cork material and the treatment the fraction has undergone. For instance, the cork fraction of the potato steam peel consists mainly of suberin (over 50%).

The most important market for the potato steam peels (PSP) is cattle feed. In the present invention, an alternative use for this subsidiary product flow has been developed. From previous research, it has appeared that the starch present in the PSP can be converted to alcohol via fermentation. After fermentation, a residual product is left, viz. the cork fraction. For this cork fraction too, an industrial application has been developed.

In the cultivation on the open ground and in, for instance, arboriculture or in container cultivation, use is made of plant protection products to prevent weed growth and fungus formation. These last years, this use of plant protection products has been under much pressure resulting in a growing need or alternatives. In consequence, much time is spent in developing formulations capable of preventing weed growth. An alternative to plant protection products is formed by the so-called soil covers (also called root cloths). However, as further described hereinbelow, the most important drawback of the existing soil covers is that they do not prevent weed growth well.

EP 0 143 913 describes cover plates with round or square openings that can be laid around trees or shrubs. These cover plates are made of tree bark and fertilizing agents and have the property that they slowly release nutrients into the ground, they also prevent the ground from dehydrating and prevent growth of weed.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,077,935 describes a cover layer consisting of a biologic layer (for instance straw) and a layer consisting of UV-degradable, synthetic material which latter layer is sewn to the biologic layer. Then, to the first synthetic layer, another, second synthetic layer is fastened.

Another example of a soil cover is described in WO 96/09355. This soil cover is based on glued straw.

EP 0 898 881 describes a soil cover based on the bark of coconut and WO 00/22916 describes a soil cover containing water, carbon black, a strengthening agent and fibers, while a copolymer of at least one alkene and at least one ester of an alkenoic acid is used as strengthening agent.

WO 00/58085 describes that potato steam peels can be used as binders for preventing silt migrations.

Preferably, a soil cover is to prevent the growth of weed by covering the soil (and hence, lies over the soil) so that, for instance, weed seeds present in the soil can hardly, if at all, come into contact with light and hence cannot develop into a plant. Naturally, it is desired that the soil cover does allow water and air to pass to thus promote the growth of the desired crops. In addition, a soil cover is preferably biodegradable, so that the environment is burdened as little as possible. An inventory of the current market in this field yields several products, such as, for instance, product based on tree bark, a product based on glued straw, a product consisting of inter alia vegetable fibers and a glue stock based on gum and a product consisting of 98% straw, 1% iron sulfate and 1% lignosulfonate. However, it appears that these products do not act well on, for instance, the open ground cultivation and in container growing. In particular poor covering, fungus formation, grasses growing through, inhibition of the growth of target crops, lack of dimensional stability or too rapid assimilation into the ground appear insurmountable problems in the use of the above-mentioned products.

The object of the present invention is to give a solution to these problems. The present invention discloses that potato steam peels and/or the cork fraction of the potato steam peels are/is a good soil cover. These soil covers exhibit inter alia a strong reduction in grasses growing through and, depending on the composition of the soil cover, no fungus formation occurs either. Through this use, the present invention provides an alternative use of the PSP and an alternative soil cover, capable of obviating at least a part of the drawbacks of the current soil covers.

The object of the invention is achieved by a soil cover comprising potato steam peels or a part, derivative or analogue thereof. The object of the invention is also achieved by a soil cover comprising a cork fraction of potato steam peels or a part, derivative or analogue thereof.

The word part “soil” in the term “soil cover” should be understood in a broad sense. Here, it relates to any soil that can be used for growing and/or cultivating plants. For instance the growth and/or cultivation on the cold, open ground (such as, for instance, the growth in an open field), the growth and/or cultivation in a container, the growth and/or cultivation in greenhouses, but also growing and/or cultivating under domestic circumstances.

As stated, potato steam peels (PSP) are a residual product of the potato processing industry and consist, chiefly, of carbohydrates (starch, cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin), protein and a cork fraction. The composition of the PSP on the basis of dry weight is as follows: carbohydrates (starch and hemicellulose) 40-60%, cellulose 2-5%, remaining organic substances 20-25%, protein 8-12%, fat 0.5-2% and inorganic material 4-8%. It is clear to the skilled person that compositions meeting the above-represented composition can be used for the present invention, independently of the manner in which they have been established. A different example of a crop whose skin can be removed by steam is tomato. A preferred embodiment relates to the use of potato steam peels or a cork fraction of potato steam peels, because the starch present is capable of forming a dense layer. The material and method section describes a method with which the PSP can be obtained. However, it is clear to the skilled person that the PSP can also be obtained in a different manner, for instance by mechanical or manual peeling.

The cork fraction is present in the skin of the potato. By treating the PSP with enzymes capable of hydrolyzing starch (for instance Termamyl, amylases and cyclodextrin glycosyltransferases (CGT-ases)), the starch fraction is (partially) hydrolyzed and a cork fraction is obtained which is representative of the fraction obtained after fermentation of starch to alcohol.

Herein, the term “or a part, derivative or analogue thereof” is inter alia understood to mean a soil cover comprising a part of the PSP. Here, in particular, for instance the cork fraction of the PSP is involved. The present invention gives several examples of a derivative of PSP, such as, for instance, chemically modified PSP. Herein, the term analogue is understood to mean any other substance which, with respect to composition, approximates the composition of the PSP. An important preference a soil cover according to the invention has to meet is the capacity to form a dense layer, so that weeds cannot grow through. A dense layer is obtained when polymers such as starch and/or hemicellulose are present in the layer. Preferably, these polymers are already present in the peels or in the cork fraction (internal polymers), so that separate addition of polymers (so-called external polymers) can be avoided. However, external polymers too such as polyacrylates and latex can be used for forming a dense layer. That is why it is clear to the skilled person that an analogue of the soil cover according to the invention must at least contain one internal or external polymer. In a preferred embodiment, the soil cover comprising the potato steam peels and/or a cork fraction of potato steam peels is at least partially dried. Preferably, the dry matter percentage is between 40% and 90%. The spread of the dry matter percentage is influenced for an important part by the air humidity and this air humidity will effect an eventual equilibrium. The at least partially dried PSP or a cork fraction of the PSP can then be easily ground so that a more uniform particle size is obtained. This promotes a simple scattering and also enables a more uniform distribution of the soil cover and therefore eventually results in a field which is preferably covered on all desired locations.

In a different preferred embodiment, the potato steam peels or the cork fraction of the potato steam peels have undergone a chemical modification, at least partially. Preferably, the (external and/or internal) carbohydrates present and, more preferably, the (external and/or internal) starch present are/is chemically modified. As a result, the amount of carbohydrates/starch available is then reduced and fungus formation is reduced and preferably completely prevented. Preferably, the chemical modification is oxidation and, more preferably, partial oxidation. Herein, a partial oxidation reaction is defined as a reaction in which between 1% and 100% of the carbohydrates present is/are oxidized. Preferably, at least 20-80%, more preferably, at least 30-70% of the carbohydrates are oxidized. It has appeared that an increase of the percentage of oxidized carbohydrates results in less fungus growth. That is why the situation where 90% of the carbohydrates have been oxidized is greatly preferred. However, it has appeared that lower oxidation percentages cap be admirably compensated by the addition of fungicides. The material and method section, as described herein, describes several protocols for carrying out an oxidation reaction. The percentage of carbohydrates that is oxidized is codetermined by the amount of oxidant used. The products can differ in composition since different types of reaction conditions result in specific regioselective modifications. An example is the use of 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO). This molecule, in combination with an oxidant such as caustic bleach, effects that virtually exclusively primary hydroxyl groups are oxidized to carboxylic acids, while in the absence of TEMPO, virtually exclusively the vicinal diol system in, for instance, glucose is oxidized to a dicarboxylic compound. Other examples of chemical modifications are substitution with monochloroacetic acid, hydrophobing with octenyl succinic acid, acetylation with acetic acid anhydride or cross-liking with sodium trimetaphosphate and epichlorohydrin. It has appeared that the polymeric carbohydrates, in particular starch, can be easily modified. With this, the properties of the cover layers to be formulated can be influenced. Due to these modifications, the amount of non-substituted carbohydrates decreases and hence the risk of fungus formation decreases too. It is clear to a skilled person that a soil cover according to the invention can also consist of a mixture of modified and non-modified potato steam peels and/or the cork fraction of potato steam peels.

In another preferred embodiment, to the soil cover comprising potato steam peels and/or a cork fraction of potato steam peels, also, at least one additive has been added. An additive can have different functions. For instance, an oil having the function of a binder can be considered, a fungicide to prevent fungus growth, a herbicide to prevent weed growth or fertilizers for promoting/stimulating the growth of the desired crops.

Preferably, the additive is an oil. Oil is used as a binder for other hydrophobic compounds. Because of possible BSE problems with animal oils, preferably, a vegetable oil is used. An additional advantage of vegetable oils is the presence of unsaturated fatty acid chains that can form a network and, in this manner, contribute to the stability of the soil cover. Examples of a vegetable oil are palm oil, soy and sunflower oil. From the point of view of costs, palm oil is preferred.

In yet another embodiment, to a soil cover according to the invention a fungicide has been added as additive. When no oxidation and/os chemical modification is used or when partial oxidation and/or chemical modification is used, the soil cover can generally further contain food sources for microorganisms in general and for fungi in particular. As a result, fungi, for instance, are capable of using the soil cover as a nutrient source. To prevent this, a fungicide is added. The fungicide effects at least a delay in the fungus growth and preferably, fungus growth is completely inhibited. An example of a fungicide as used in the examples is lignin or a lignin derivative. An example of a lignin derivative is lignin sulfonate. It is clear to the skilled person that the selection of fungicides is wide and a list of current fungicides can be found, for instance, on the internet site http://www.extremity.nodak.edu/extpubs/plantsci/pests/pp622pricefile.htm. An overview of fungicides based on this internet site is given in Table 1. However, since this internet site is not complete and as this list is also subject to changes, the enumeration of fungicides in Table 1 should not be construed as being limitative of the present invention.

In yet another embodiment, to the soil cover according to the invention a herbicide has been added as an additive. From the examples of the present patent application, it appears that a soil cover according to the invention prevents germination of seeds present in the soil as well as germination of seeds present on the soil cover. By adding a herbicide, undesired germination can be reduced even more. Also, in the case weed growth were to occur, for instance in the case that soil is blown on the soil cover or a different source of germination ends up on the soil cover, it is possible to also add a herbicide to the soil cover. It is clear to the skilled person that the selection of herbicides is wide and a list of current herbicides can be found, for instance, on internet page http://www.abcbirds.org/pesticides/herbicide list .htm. An overview of herbicides based on this internet site is given in Table 2. However, since this internet site is not complete and as this list is also subject to changes, the enumeration of herbicides in Table 2 should not be construed as being limitative of the present invention.

In a different embodiment, to a soil cover according to the invention, as additive, a food supplement for plants has been added. Preferably, the food supplements to be added are adapted to the specific crop which is cultivated and/or grown on the soil covered by the so cover. In this type of uses, the soil cover has at least two functions, viz. preventing weed growth and promoting, for instance, the growth of a desired crop by releasing one or more food supplements. When food supplements are added, for instance the addition of commercially available fertilizers can be considered. The expert skilled person is capable of selecting the proper fertilizers for particular crops and adding them to a soil cover according to the invention. Non-limitative examples are trace elements such as manganese, magnesium and the like or nitrogen-containing and phosphate-containing inorganic salts.

In another alternative embodiment, to a soil cover according to the invention, a pesticide has been added as additive. Here, for instance anti-nematode agents can be considered. It is clear to the skilled person that the selection of pesticides is wide and a list of current pesticides can be found on, for instance, internet page http://wizard.arsusda.gov/acsl/ppdb3.html. An overview of pesticides based on this internet site is given in Table 3. However, since this internet site is not complete and as this list is also subject to changes, the enumeration of pesticides in Table 2 should not be construed as being limitative of the present invention.

Naturally, use can also be made of combinations of different additives, for instance a fungicide and a herbicide et cetera.

Depending on the eventual composition, a soil cover according to the invention preferably has a number of properties the current soil covers do not have. From the Examples, it appears that the cover layers formed are water and air permeable, form a uniform layer and are capable of covering the entire surface. All formulated layers have an inhibitory action on weed growth (weed sown before the layer is applied as well as weed sown after the layer has been formed). A soil cover according to the invention is also capable of preventing the growth of grasses. Depending on the formulation used, it is also possible to form a layer which, under the given circumstances, does not exhibit fungus formation.

The invention also provides a method for preventing weed growth by using a soil cover comprising PSP or a cork fraction of the PSP. The soil cover can be applied in different manners. For instance, it is possible to dry the soil cover, to optionally grind it and scatter it in dry condition. This method finds use for instance in container growth. Due to the low specific weight of the soil cover, the scattering can be easily effected. However, in an open field, the low specific weight may lead to the soil cover being blown away. To prevent this, in an open field situation, the soil cover is preferably applied in wet condition, (for instance via spraying) or a soil cover applied in dry condition is wetted after scattering, so that a compact soil cover is formed. Preferably, the soil cover is applied after the desired plants have germinated visibly and project above the soil, so that the desired plants are not hindered by the presence of the soil cover. Preferably, the invention therefore provides a method for preventing weed growth by using a soil cover according to the invention, characterized in that the soil cover is applied in dry condition and is subsequently moistened.

From the examples given herein, it appears that shrinkage of the soil cover can occur. Naturally, this has as a drawback that not all parts of the soil are covered, so that, in places, weed growth can still occur. In some examples, the effect of (chemical) modification, such as, for instance, substituting with monochloroacetic acid, hydrophobing with octenyl succinic acid or cross-linking with sodium trimetaphosphate and epichlorodydrin has been examined. The cover layers in which TMP (sodium trimetaphosphate) peels have been used as addition dry fastest (approximately 1 week) and exhibit the most shrinkage. The cover layers made of oxidized peels appear to remain moist the longest and exhibit little shrinkage as a result thereof. As to drying rate, the layers to which acetylated peels have been added are between cover layers with TMP peels as addition and layers with oxidized peels. These layers exhibit less shrinkage than the layers to which TMP has been added. Layers having 10% of lignosulfonate as additive appear to shrink less. From this, it appears that the eventual properties of the soil cover can be adapted to all wishes and circumstances. Preferably, the invention provides a method for reducing shrinkage of a soil cover comprising potato steam peels or a cork fraction of potato steam peels, characterized in that the soil cover comprises oxidized peels.

The invention also provides the use of potato steam peels for preventing weed growth. In addition, the invention provides the use of a cork fraction of potato steam peels for preventing weed growth.

In addition to using the soil cover by itself, it is clear that the soil cover herein described can also be used in combination with a different environmentally friendly cover layer. For instance, a combination with straw and/or saw dust can be considered.

Hereinbelow, the invention is further elucidated with reference to a number of examples. However, these examples should not be used to delimit the scope of the invention.

EXAMPLES

Material and Methods

Production of Potato Steam Peels

First, the potatoes were washed and then, the peel was removed by treating the potatoes with steam under pressure for several seconds in a pressure tank. This treatment allowed the skin to become detached from the potato, so that the peel could be removed by a brushing machine.

Termamyl Treatment (Isolation Cork Fraction from Potato Steam Peels)

To 500 g of supplied potato steam peels (both washed and unwashed) were added 500 ml of water. The temperature of the mixture is brought to 65° C. When this temperature is reached, 5 ml of Termamyl are added (720 units enzyme). Thereupon, the reaction mixture is incubated for 5 hours while being stirred. Then, the reaction mixture is filtered, whereupon the residue (the peels) is washed twice with water and once with ethanol. The remaining fraction is dried at room temperature in the air and ground with a coffee grinder.

Synthesis with Sodium Trimetaphosphate (STMP)

Recipe 1:

To 58 g of potato steam peels (washed as well as unwashed) are added 17 g of potassium hydroxide and 11 g of STMP. Subsequently, the reaction mixture is maintained at 60° C. for 5 hours. Thereupon, additional water is added (50 ml) and the reaction mixture is neutralized with 4 M HCl. Then, the reaction mixture is filtered through a P2 glass filter and the residue is rinsed with water. Thereupon, the residue is suspended in ethanol, filtered and rinsed with ethanol and dried in the air at room temperature.

Recipe 2:

To 300 grams of peels (1) are added 100 ml of water, 8 grams of NaOH and 5 grams of STMP. Then, the reaction mixture is maintained at 60° C. for 3 hours, whereupon the slurry is neutralized with 4 M HCl. Hereupon, the peels are filtered through a glass filter and rinsed with 1.5 liters of water and 1 liter of alcohol. The peels axe dried at room temperature in the air on filtering paper.

Synthesis with Monochloroacetic Acid

To 50 g of cryogenically ground potato steam peels (1) are added 15 g of sodium hydroxide and 10 g of monochloroacetic acid. The reaction mixture is stirred well for 4 hours at 65° C. Hereupon, water is added (50 ml) and neutralized with 4 M HCl. Then, the product is isolated via ethanol precipitation.

Synthesis with Octenyl Succinic Acid.

With this compound, two reactions were carried out:

-   1) To 50 g of peels (1) ground under nitrogen, 60 ml of water are     added. Then, the mixture is brought to pH 9 with 0.5 M KOH whereupon     15 ml of octenyl succinic acid anhydride are added in 3 portions (5     ml each). During the addition, the pH is kept constant with the aid     of a pH-stat. The product is isolated by rinsing it with water     (approximately 1 liter). -   2) To 50 g of peels (1) ground under nitrogen were added 75 ml of     water pH 13 and 5 g of octenyl succinic acid anhydride. With the aid     of a pH-stat, the pH is maintained constant at 9. After 30 minutes,     again, 10 g of octenyl succinic acid anhydride are added. The     solution appears to thicken during the reaction, but is thin again     at the end of the reaction. This product is worked up as described     at 1.

Oxidation of Termamyl-Treated Peels in the Presence of TEMPO (2,2,6,6 tetramethyl piperidine 1 oxyl).

The oxidation of peels was carried out with TEMPO/NaOCl/Br—. The carbohydrate present was oxidized maximally as well as partially. An example of a partial oxidation is described hereinbelow:

To 10 grams of peels treated with Termamyl, 250 ml of water are added and the pH is brought to 10. To the slurry are added 0.5 gram of Tempo, 0.2 gram of NaBr dissolved in water and 25 ml of NaOCl (55 meq) in portions of 5 ml. The pH is maintained at 10 with 1 M NaOH under pH stat conditions. For this reaction, in total, 45.3 mmol of NaOH are required to keep the pH constant. When no additional acid formation is observed, the reaction is stopped, the solution neutralized and filtered through a glass filter.

Oxidation of Termamyl-Treated Peels with NaOCl

To 10 grams of peels 250 ml of water are added and the pH is brought to 10. To the slurry 25 ml of NaOCl are added in portions of 5 ml. The reaction proceeds considerably slower than the reaction in which TEMPO and sodium bromide are present. In total 22.8 mmol of NaOH are added. When no acid formation is observed any longer, the reaction is stopped and the slurry is neutralized and filtered.

Oxidation Peels (1)

300 grams of peels (1) are stirred up with a top stirrer in 800 ml of water. Then are added 1.0 g of TEMPO and 0.25 grams of NaBr and the pH is brought to 10 with NaOH. Then, 125 ml of NaOCl are added in portions of 5 ml. The pH is maintained at 10 with 1M NaOH via an automatic titration. In total, 170 ml of 1M NaOH are added. Then, to the peels, ethanol is added and filtered through a glass filter. The peels are rinsed with 1 liter of 100% ethanol and dried in the air at room temperature on filtering paper.

Oxidation of the Peels after Termamyl Treatment

30 grams of peels, which are treated with Termamyl as described in earlier reports, are stirred up with a top stirrer in 800 ml of water. To this are added 1 gram of TEMPO and 0.25 gram of NaBr. The pH is brought to 10 with NaOH and 75 ml of NaOCl are added in portions of 5 ml. During the reaction, the pH is maintained at 10 with 1M NaOH via an automatic titration. In total, 71.4 ml of 1M NaOH are added. Thereupon, to the peels, 800 ml of ethanol are added and filtered. Then, the peels are rinsed with 11 liters of ethanol and dried in the air at room temperature on filtering paper.

Acetylation of Peels

Recipe 1:

To 50 grams of peels (1) 250 ml of water are added. The pH is brought to 9 and maintained under pH stat conditions. 5.40 grams of acetic acid anhydride are added in portions of 0.22 gram. For the total reaction and pH adjustment, 107 mmol of NaOH are added. Afterwards, the mixture is neutralized and filtered through a glass filter. This reaction has also been carried out at pH 8 under pH stat conditions.

Recipe 2:

200 grams of peels (2) are stirred up in 700 ml of water whereupon the pH is brought to 8. To the slurry, 50 ml of acetic acid anhydride are added in portions of 2.5 ml. The pH is maintained at 8 via an automatic titration with NaOH (1M and 33% NaOH solution). Hereupon, the slurry is neutralized with 4M HCl and filtered, rinsed with 500 ml of water and 1 liter of 100% alcohol. The peels are dried in the air at room temperature on filtering paper.

RESULTS

An important preference to be met by a soil cover according to the invention is the capacity of forming a dense layer, so that a good covering of the soil is obtained. For forming a dense layer, use is made of a binder. This binder can be obtained through modification of the carbohydrate fraction in the potato steam peel via, for instance, oxidizing, cross-linking and hydrophobing (acetylating). With these components, different formulations were tested from which, subsequently, 5 formulations were selected for a field test in container cultivation. From these formulations it has appeared that the starch, already present and gelatinized, can also serve as binder.

Characterization of the Raw Materials

For the research, two types of potato steam peels (PSP) were used, i.e. washed peels (peels 1) and additionally washed peels (peels 2). These peels were subsequently treated with enzymes (for instance Termamyl) for hydrolyzing the starch fraction so that a cork fraction is obtained, which is representative of the fraction obtained after fermentation of starch to alcohol. In addition, the two types of PSP were used without them having been processed with enzymes.

The carbohydrate fractions of the PSP were analyzed with the DIONEX system (PPAEC{high pressure anion exchange chromatography}). This analysis is preceded by, first, hydrolyzing for 1 hour in 12 M of sulfuric acid at 35° C., followed by 1 hour of hydrolysis in 2 M sulfuric acid at 100° C. In addition, the peels were also hydrolyzed in only 2 M sulfuric acid.

The analyses show that both the additionally rinsed peels (peels 2) and the enzymatically treated peels contain less starch than peels 1, while it can be noted that the enzymatically treated peels contain less starch than the rinsed peels.

Chemical Modification of the Carbohydrate Fraction

In patent literature (for instance WO 96/09355) is has been described that for adhesion of a top layer to prevent weed growth, the use of additives enabling a better binding of the material, is an important component. Due to this binding, the layer will not be blown away rapidly. These additives are based on polymers such as starch. It may be assumed that this also holds for the cork fraction of the PSP. As the PSP fraction already contains polymeric carbohydrates, it will not be necessary to add, for instance, additional starch. An advantage of the use of PSP is that the starch has already gelatinized and, hence, is readily accessible for chemical modification.

A number of modifications were carried out according to the methods represented in the material and method section, i.e.:

-   -   Oxidizing.     -   Substituting with monochloroacetic acid.     -   Hydrophobing with octenyl succinic acid or via acetylating with         acetic acid anhydride.     -   Cross-linking with sodium trimetaphosphate.

It has appeared that the polymeric carbohydrates, in particular starch, are easily modifiable. With this, the properties of the cover layers to be formulated can be influenced.

Formulation of the Cover Layers

On the basis of the cork fraction of the PSP, a number of cover layer formulations were composed, with variation of the type of modified PSP as additive, lignin and palm oil. These formulations are summarized in Table 4. TABLE 4 Cover layer formulations Palm Lignosulfonate oil No. Peels Addition (%) (%) 1 Peels (2) dried 5% TMP Peels 5 — 2 Peels (2) dried 5% TMP Peels 5 5 3 Peels after Termamyl 5% TMP Peels 5 — 4 Peels after Termamyl 5% TMP Peels 5 5 5 Peels (2) dried 5% Ac Peels 5 — 6 Peels (2) dried 5% Ac Peels 5 5 7 Peels after Termamyl 5% Ac Peels 5 — 8 Peels after Termamyl 5% Ac Peels 5 5 9 Peels (1) oxidized 5% TMP Peels 5 — 10 Peels (1) oxidized 5% TMP Peels 5 5 11 Peels (1) oxidized 5% Ac Peels 5 — 12 Peels (1) oxidized 5% Ac Peels 5 5 13 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% TMP Peels 5 — 14 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% TMP Peels 5 5 15 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% Ac Peels 5 — 16 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% Ac Peels 5 5 17 Peels (2) dried 5% TMP Peels 10 — 18 Peels (2) dried 5% TMP Peels 10 5 19 Peels (2) dried 5% Ac Peels 10 — 20 Peels (2) dried 5% Ac Peels 10 5 21 Peels after Termamyl 5% TMP Peels 10 — 22 Peels after Termamyl 5% TMP Peels 10 5 23 Peels after Termamyl 5% Ac Peels 10 — 24 Peels after Termamyl 5% Ac Peels 10 5 25 Peels (1) oxidized 5% TMP Peels 10 — 26 Peels (1) oxidized 5% TMP Peels 10 5 27 Peels (1) oxidized 5% Ac Peels 10 — 28 Peels (1) oxidized 5% Ac Peels 10 5 29 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% TMP Peels 10 — 30 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% TMP Peels 10 5 31 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% Ac Peels 10 — 32 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% Ac Peels 10 5 33 Peels (2) dried 5% TMP Peels — — 34 Peels (2) dried 5% TMP Peels — 5 35 Peels (2) dried 5% Ac Peels — — 36 Peels (2) dried 5% Ac Peels — 5 37 Peels after Termamyl 5% TMP Peels — — 38 Peels after Termamyl 5% TMP Peels — 5 39 Peels after Termamyl 5% Ac Peels — — 40 Peels after Termamyl 5% Ac Peels — 5 41 Peels (1) oxidized 5% TMP Peels — — 42 Peels (1) oxidized 5% TMP Peels — 5 43 Peels (1) oxidized 5% Ac Peels — — 44 Peels (1) oxidized 5% Ac Peels — 5 45 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% TMP Peels — — 46 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% TMP Peels — 5 47 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% Ac Peels — — 48 Termamyl Peels oxidized 5% Ac Peels — 5 49 Peels (2) dried — — — 50 Peels after Termamyl — — — 51 Peels (1) oxidized — — — 52 Termamyl Peels oxidized — — — 53 50% Peels (2) 50% 5% TMP Peels 10 5 peel (1) oxidized 54 50% Peels (2) 50% 5% Ac Peels 10 5 peel (1) oxidized

These cover layers were monitored for three weeks at room temperature for shrinkage, dehydration, water permeability and fungus growth. Also, barley is included as a “weed” in the test as described hereinbelow.

This example is normative for all formulated layers as described in Table 4. Cultivated barley plants are covered with a layer of partially oxidized peels to which 20% lignosulfate has been added. A blank experiment was carried out with barley grain in the soil without cover layer. After a number of weeks, it appears that the cover layer has no influence on the growth of the barley plants. Both grow well (blank and plants with cover layer).

In addition, weed was put into the soil and a cover layer of partially oxidized peels/lignosulfate was superposed. In turn, on the cover layer weed seeds were put. Subsequently, for three weeks, every second day, watering took place. The seeds on the cover layer do not germinate and there are no fungi on the cover layer and no weed grows through the cover layer.

From the results, a number of conclusions can be drawn:

-   -   All layers formulated do not allow weed growth (both weed sown         before the layer is applied and weed sown after the layer has         been formed.).     -   None of the cover layers exhibits fungus formation under the         circumstances given. However, it seems that the layers to which         vegetable oil has been added, exhibit a budding form of fungus         formation. It appears, however, that this budding fungus         formation can be obviated by means of fungicides.     -   The cover layers in which TMP peels have been used as addition,         dry quickest (approximately 1 week) and exhibit the most         shrinkage.     -   The cover layers made of oxidized peels appear to remain moist         the longest and, hence, exhibit little shrinkage.     -   All layers are air and water permeable.     -   As to drying rate, the layers to which acetylated peels have         been added are between the cover layers with TMP peels as         addition and layers with oxidized peels. These layers exhibit         less shrinkage than the layers to which TMP has been added.     -   When the layers do not dehydrate, the layers will hardly shrink,         if at all.     -   Layers having 10% lignosulfonate as additive appear to shrink         less.         Formulation of Five Cover Layers for a Study in Container         Growth.

On the basis of these observations, five formulations were selected for a field test in container growth, i.e.

-   1) Blank consisting of dried peels with 10% lignosulfonate as     additive. -   2) Dried peels with an addition of 5% TMP peels and 10%     lignosulfonate. -   3) Dried peels with an addition of 5% acetylated peels and 10%     lignosulfonate. -   4) Oxidized peels with 10% lignosulfonate -   5) Oxidized peels 50%, with 50% dried peels with 10% lignosulfonate     as additive.

From each of the five formulations, 1 kilo was prepared. The field test was carried out on cuttings, projecting above the soil approximately two centimeters and over which the cover layer was scattered. The amount of cover layer per m² was less than 1 kilo. Subsequently, the cuttings were moistened via atomization whereupon plastic is stretched over the plants. As a result, moisture remains high for the purpose of promoting the growth of roots maximally. The temperature in the greenhouse is between 2° C. and 7° C.

After a number of weeks, it appears that only layer number 4 does not exhibit fungus formation. Layers in which native starch is still present do exhibit fungus formation. For this use, it is advisable to previously admix fungicides.

When the starch fraction has modified completely, the fungus growth appears not to occur.

From the field test, the following conclusions are drawn:

-   -   when using a dried peel fraction, preferably, a fungicide will         be used     -   preferably, the starch fraction is completely removed from the         peel fraction, so that fungus growth cannot occur     -   the starch fraction can be modified (for instance oxidized) to         prevent fungus growth.

As an option, it is noted that admixing, for instance, growth regulating substances or fertilizers (minerals and other nutrients) adds additional value to the cover layer. TABLE 1 Overview of fungicides (active component and product name) active component product name azoxystrobin Quadris copper Champ DP copper Champ Formula 2, Flowable copper Kocide 2000, DF copper Kocide 4.5 LF mancozeb Dithane DF Rainshield NT mancozeb Dithane F-45 mancozeb Manex II mancozeb Manzate 75 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 75 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 80 WP mancozeb + copper ManKocide propiconazole PropiMax EC propiconazole Tilt tebuconazole (section 18) Folicur 3.6 F (section 18) azoxystrobin Quadris vinclozolin Ronilan EG chlorothalonil Bravo Ultrex chlorothalonil Echo 720 chlorothalonil Equus DF azoxystrobin Quadris propiconazole Tilt vinclozolin Ronilan EG chlorothalonil Bravo Ultrex chlorothalonil Bravo Weatherstick chlorothalonil Echo 720 chlorothalonil Echo ZN chlorothalonil Equus DF copper Basicop WP copper Champ DP copper Champ Formula 2, Flowable copper Kocide 2000, DF copper Kocide 4.5 LF iprodione Rovral 4F maneb Maneb 75 DF maneb Maneb 80 maneb Manex sulfur Microthiol sulfur Thiolux thiophanate-methyl T-methyl thiophanate-methyl Topsin M WSB sulfur Kumulus DF sulfur Micro Sulf sulfur Thiolux copper Champ DP copper Champ Formula 2, Flowable copper Kocide 2000, DF copper Kocide 4.5 LF mancozeb Dithane DF Rainshield NT mancozeb Dithane F-45 mancozeb Manex II mancozeb Manzate 75 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 75 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 80 WP mancozeb + copper ManKocide propiconazole PropiMax EC propiconazole Tilt azoxystrobin Quadris chlorothalonil Bravo Ultrex chlorothalonil Bravo Weatherstick chlorothalonil Bravo ZN chlorothalonil Echo 720 chlorothalonil Echo ZN chlorothalonil Equus DF copper Basicop WP copper Champ DP copper Champ Formula 2, Flowable copper Kocide 2000, DF copper Kocide 4.5 LF cymoxanil Curzate 60 DF dimethomorph Acrobat 50 WP fluazinam Omega 500 F iprodione Rovral 4F mancozeb Dithane DF Rainshield NT mancozeb Dithane F-45 mancozeb Manex II mancozeb Menzate 75 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 76 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 80 WP mancozeb + zoxamide Gavel 75 DF maneb Maneb 75 DF maneb Maneb 80 maneb Manex mefenoxam + chlorothalonil Flouronil mefenoxam + chlorothalonil Ridomil Gold/Bravo WP mefenoxam + copper hydroxide Ridomil Gold/Copper mefenoxam + mancozeb Ridomil Gold MZ metiram Polyram 80 DF propamocarb Previcur trifloxystrobin Gem triphenyltin hydroxide Agri Tin triphenyltin hydroxide Super Tin 80 WP mancozeb Dithane DF Rainshield NT mancozeb Dithane F.45 mancozeb Manex II mancozeb Manzate 75 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 75 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 80 WP propiconazole PropiMax EC propiconazole Tilt chlorothalonil Bravo Ultrex chlorothalonil Bravo Weatherstick chlorothalonil Echo 720 chlorothalonil Equus DF thiophanate-methyl T-methyl thiophanate-methyl Topsin M 70 WSB azoxystrobin Quadris copper Basicop WP copper Champ DP copper Champ Formula 2, Flowable copper Kocide 2000, DF copper Kocide 4.5 LF mancozeb Dithane DF Rainshield NT mancozeb Dithane F-45 mancozeb Manex II mancozeb Manzate 75 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 75 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 80 WP mancozeb + copper ManKocide maneb Maneb 75 DF maneb Maneb 80 maneb Manex sulfur Micro Sulf sulfur Microthiol sulfur Thiolux tetraconazole (section 18) Eminent 125 SL (section 18) thiophanate-methyl T-methyl thiophanate-methyl Topsin M WSB trifloxystrobin Gem triphenyltin hydroxide Agri Tin triphenyltin hydroxide Super Tin 80 WP tobuconazole (section 18) Folicur 3.6 F (section 18) azoxystrobin Quadris copper Champ DP copper Champ Formula 2, Flowable copper Kocide 2000. DF copper Kocide 4.5 LF mancozeb Dithane DF Rainshield NT mancozeb Dithane F-45 mancozeb Manex II mancozeb Manzate 75 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 75 DF mancozeb Penncozeb 80 WP mancozeb + copper ManKocide propiconazole PropiMax EC propiconazole Tilt tebuconazole (section 18) Folicur 3.6 F (section 18) trifloxystrobin + propiconazole Stratego

TABLE 2 Overview of herbicides (active components and product names) 2,4-D 2,4-DB AATREX atrazine ACCENT nicosulfuron ACCLAIM fenoxaprop ACCORD glyphosate ALLY metsulfuron ARSENAL imazquin ASSURE II quizalofop ATRAZINES atrazine BALAN benefin BANVEL dicamba BARRICADE prodiamine BASAGRAN bentazon BEACON primisulfuron BENSULIDE bensulide BETASAN bensulide BLADEX cyanazine BLAZER acifluorfen BUCTRIL bromoxynil CASORON dichlobenil CHOPPER imazapyr CLARITY dicamba CLASSIC chlorimuron COBRA lactofen DACTHAL DCPA DEVRINOL napropamide (dichlorprop) 2,4-DP DIMENSION dithiopyr DIQUAT diquat DUAL metolachlor DUAL II metolachlor EPTAM EPTC ENDURANCE prodiamine ERADICANE EPTC EXPRESS tribenuron FINALE glufosinate FRONTIER dimethenamid FUSILADE 2000 fluazifop-P FUSILADE DX fluazifop-P GARLON triclopyr GOAL oxyfluorfen GLEAN chlorsulfuron GRAMOXONE paraquat HARMONY thifensulfuron HARNESS acetochlor HORIZON fenoxaprop HYVAR bromacil IGNITE glufosinate KARMEX diuron KERB pronamide LASSO alachlor LENTAGRAN pyridate LEXONE metribuzin LIBERTY glufosinate LINEX linuron LONTREL clopyralid LOROX linuron MANAGE halosulfuron (mecoprop) MCPP/MCPA MICRO-TECH alachlor OPTION fenoxaprop OUST sulfometuron PARTNER alachlor PENDULUM pendimethalin PENTAGON pendimethalin PERMIT halosulfuron PINNACLE thifensulfuron POAST sethoxydim POAST PLUS sethoxydim PRAMITOL prometon PREFAR bensulide PROWL pendimethalin PRINCEP simazine PURSUIT imazethapyr RAMROD propachlor REFLEX fomesafen RELY glufosinate REWARD diquat RODEO glyphosate RO-NEET cycloate ROUNDUP ULTRA glyphosate SCEPTER imazquin SELECT clethodim SENCOR metribuzin SINBAR terbacil SONALAN ethalfluralin SPIKE tebuthiuron STARANE fluroxypyr STINGER clopyralid STOMP pendimethalin SURFLAN oryzalin SURPASS acetochlor SUTAN + butylate TELAR chlorsulfuron TILLAM pebulate TORDON picloram TOUCHDOWN sulfosate TREFELAN trifluralin TOPNOTCH acetochlor TOUGH pyridate TUPERSSAN siduron TURFLON triclopyr VANQUISH dicamba VELPAR hexazinone VETERAN dicamba WHIP fenoxaprop

TABLE 3 Overview of pesticides 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1-NAPHTHALENEACETAMIDE 1-NAPHTHYLACETIC ACID 2,4,5-T ACID 2,4,5-T AMINE SALTS 2,4,5-T ESTERS 2,4-D-ACID 2,4-DB BUTOXYETHYL ESTERS 2,4-DB DIMETHYLAMINE ABAMECTIN ACEPHATE ACIFLUORFEN SODIUM SALT ACROLEIN ALACHLOR ALDICARB ALDOXYCARB ALDRIN AMETRYN AMINOCARB AMITRAZ AMITROLE ANCYMIDOL ANILAZINE ARSENIC ACID ASULAM SODIUM ATRAZINE AZIMSULFURON AZINPHOS-MF BARBAN BENALAXYL BENDIOCARB BENEFIN BENODANIL BENOMYL BENSULFURON ME BENSULIDE BENTAZON SODIUM SALT BIFENOX BIFENTHRIN BROMACIL BROMOXYNIL BUTYRATE BROMOXYNIL OCTANOATE BUTACHLOR BUTYLATE CAPTAFOL CAPTAN CARBARYL CARBENDAZIM CARBOFURON CARBON DISULFIDE CARBOPHENOTHION CARBOXIN CDAA CHLORAMBEN CHLORBROMURON CHLORDANE CHLORDIMEFORM CHLORDIMEFORM HCl CHLORETHOXYFOS CHLORFENAC SODIUM SALT CHLORIDAZON CHLORIMURON ET CHLOROBENZILATE CHLORONEB CHLOROPICRIN CHLOROPTHALONIL CHLOROXURON CHLORPROPHAM CHLORPYRIFOS CHLORPYRIFOS-METHYL CHLORSULFURON CHLOZOLINATE CINMETHYLIN CLOFENTEZINE CLOMAZONE CLOPYRALID CRYOLITE CYANAZINE CYCLOATE CYFLUTHRIN CYHALOTHRIN CYHEXATIN CYMOXANIL CYPERMETHRIN CYROMAZINE DALAPON SODIUM SALT DAMINOZIDE DAZOMET DBCP DCNA DICLORAN DCPA CHLORTHAL-DIMETHYL DDD DDE DDT DEMETON DESMEDIPHAM DI-ALLATE DIAZINON DICAMBA DICHLOBENIL DICHLONE DICHLORMID DICHLOROPROPENE DICHLORPROP DICHLORVOS DICLOFOP-ME DICOFOL DICROTOPHOS DIELDRIN DIENOCHLOR DIETHATYL-ET DIFENZOQUAT ME-SULFATE DIFLUBENZURON DIMETHIPIN DIMETHIRIMOL DIMETHOATE DIMETHYLARSINIC ACID DINITRAMINE DINOCAP DINOSEB DIOXACARB DIPROPETRYN DIQUAT DIBROMIDE DISULFOTON DIURON DNOC DODINE ACETATE SALT DSMA ENDOSULFAN ENDOTHALL ENDRIN EPN EPTC ESFENVALERATE ETHALFLURALIN ETHAMETSULFURON METHYL ETHEPHON ETHOFUMESATE ETHOPROP ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE ETRIDIAZOLE FENAMINOSULF FENAMIPHOS FENARIMOL FENBUTATIN OXIDE FENFURAM FENITROTHION FENOPROP FENOXAPROP-ET FENOXYCARB FENPROPATHRIN FENSULFOTHION FENTHION FENURON FENVALERATE FERBAM FLUAZIFOP-BUTYL FLUAZIFOP-P-BUTYL FLUCHLORALIN FLUCYTHRINATE FLUMETRALIN FLUMETSULAM FLUOMETURON FLUPYRSULFURON METHYL FLURIDONE FLUSILAZOLE FOMESAFEN FONOFOS FORMETANATE HCl FOSAMINE AMMONIUM FOSETYL ALUMINUM GLUFOSINATE-AMMONIUM GLYPHOSATE HALOXYFOP-METHYL HEPTACHLOR HEXACHLOROBENZENE HEXAZINONE HYDRAMETHYLNON IMAZALIL IMAZAMETHABENZ-ME P-ISOMER IMAZAPYR ACID IMAZAPYR ISOPROPYLAMINE SALT IMAZAQUIN-ACID IMAZAQUIN AMMONIUM IMAZETHAPYR IPRODIONE ISAZOFOS ISOFENPHOS ISOPROPALIN ISOXABEN LACTOFEN LENACIL LINDANE LINURON MALATHION MALEIC HYDRAZIDE ACID MALEIC HYDRAZIDE K SALT MANCOZEB MANEB MCPA MCPB MECOPROP MEFLUIDIDE MEPIQUAT CHLORIDE METALAXYL METALDEHYDE METHAM SODIUM METHAMIDOPHOS METHAZOLE METHIOCARB METHOMYL METHOXYCHLOR METHYL BROMIDE METHYL ISOTHIOCYANATE METHYL PARATHION METIRAM METOLACHLOR METRIBUZIN METSULFURON ME MEVINPHOS MEXACARBATE MIREX MOLINATE MONOCROTOPHOS MONOLINURON MONURON MSMA MYCLOBUTANIL NALED NAPHTHALENE NAPROPAMIDE NAPTALAM SODIUM SALT NEBURON NICOSULFURON NITRAPYRIN NORFLURAZON ORYZALIN OXADIAZON OXAMYL OXYCARBOXIN OXYDEMETON-ME OXYFLUORFEN PACLOBUTRAZOL PARAQUAT DICHLORIDE PARATHION PEBULATE PENDIMETHALIN PENTACHLOROPHENOL PERFLUIDONE PERIMIPHOS-ETHYL PERMETHRIN PHENMEDIPHAM PHENTHOATE PHORATE PHOSALONE PHOSMET PHOSPHAMIDON PICLORAM PIPERALIN PIRIMICARB PIRIMIPHOS-ETHYL PRIMISULFURON-METHYL PROCHLORAZ PROCYMIDONE PRODIAMINE PROFENOFOS PROFLURALIN PROMECARB PROMETON PROMETRYN PROPACHLOR PROPAMOCARB HCL PROPANIL PROPARGITE PROPAZINE PROPHAM PROPICONAZOLE PROPOXUR PROPYZAMIDE PYRETHRINS PYRITHIOBAC SODIUM QUINOMETHIONATE QUINTOZENE QUIZALOFOP-ET RESMETHRIN RIMSULFURON ROTENONE SECBUMETON SETHOXYDIM SIDURON SIMAZINE SIMETRYN SODIUM CHLORATE SULFOMETURON-ME SULPROFOS TAU-FLUVALINATE TCA-SODIUM TEBUTHIURON TEMEPHOS TERBACIL TERBUFOS TERBUTRYN TETRACHLORVINPHOS THIABENDAZOLE THIDIAZURON THIFENSULFURON ME THIOBENCARB THIOCYCLAM-HYDROGEN OXIDE THIODICARB THIOPHANATE-ME THIRAM TOLCLOFOS-METHYL TOXAPHENE TRALOMETHRIN TRIADIMEFON TRIADIMENOL TRIALLATE TRIASULFURON TRIBENURON-ME TRIBUFOS TRICHLORFON TRICHLORONAT TRICLOPYR TRICYCLAZOLE TRIDIPHANE TRIFLUMIZOLE TRIFLURALIN TRIFLUSULFURON METHYL TRIFORINE TRIMETHACARB VINCLOZOLIN ZINEB ZIRAM

REFERENCES

-   EP 0 143 913 A2: Material zur Wachstumforderung, Verfahren zur     Herstellung eines derartigen Materials und Verwendung von     Materialien dieser Art (publication date Jun. 10, 1985) -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,077,935: Mulch cover (publication date Jan. 07,     1992) -   WO 96/09355: Covering material for agricultural and horticultural     soil (publication date Mar. 28, 1996) -   EP 0 898 881 A1; Ground covering materials and applications thereof     (publication date Mar. 03, 1999) -   WO 00/22916; Agent for covering a soil surface (publication date     Apr. 27, 2000) -   WO 00/58085; Packaging and structural materials comprising potato     peel waste (publication date Oct. 05, 2000) 

1. A soil cover, characterized in that it comprises potato steam peels or a part, derivative or analogue thereof.
 2. A soil cover according to claim 1, characterized in that it comprises a cork fraction of potato steam peels or a part, derivative or analogue thereof.
 3. A soil cover according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the potato steam peels or the cork fraction of the potato steam peels are at least partially dried.
 4. A soil cover according to any one of claims 1-3, characterized in that the potato steam peels or the cork fraction of the potato steam peels have undergone a chemical modification, at least partially.
 5. A soil cover according to claim 4, characterized in that starch has undergone a chemical modification.
 6. A soil cover according to claim 4 or 5, characterized in that the chemical modification is at least partial oxidation.
 7. A soil cover according to any one of claims 1-6, characterized in that it also comprises at least one additive.
 8. A soil cover according to claim 7, characterized in that the additive is an oil.
 9. A soil cover according to claim 7 or 8, characterized in that the additive is a fungicide.
 10. A soil cover according to claim 9, characterized in that the fungicide is a lignin or a lignin derivative.
 11. A soil cover according to any one of claims 7-10, characterized in that the additive is a herbicide.
 12. A soil cover according to any one of claims 7-11, characterized in that the additive is a food supplement.
 13. A method for preventing weed growth by using a soil cover, characterized in that a soil cover according to any one of claims 1-13 is used.
 14. A method for preventing weed growth by using a soil cover according to claim 13, characterized in that the soil cover is applied in dry condition and is subsequently moistened.
 15. A method for reducing shrinkage of a soil cover comprising potato steam peels or a cork fraction of potato steam peels, characterized in that the soil cover comprises oxidized peels.
 16. The use of potato steam peels for preventing weed growth.
 17. The use of a cork fraction of potato steam peels for preventing weed growth. 